[Spec][1/N] Decoupled speculative decoding: IPC protocol + cross-process request id + server flags (#27634)
This commit is contained in:
@@ -518,6 +518,52 @@ class TestPortArgs(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
self.assertTrue(port_args.detokenizer_ipc_name.startswith("ipc://"))
|
||||
self.assertIsInstance(port_args.nccl_port, int)
|
||||
|
||||
@patch("sglang.srt.server_args.tempfile.NamedTemporaryFile")
|
||||
def test_init_new_builds_decoupled_spec_ipc_config(self, mock_temp_file):
|
||||
mock_temp_file.return_value.name = "temp_file"
|
||||
|
||||
server_args = ServerArgs(model_path="dummy")
|
||||
server_args.nccl_port = None
|
||||
server_args.enable_dp_attention = False
|
||||
server_args.decoupled_spec_role = "verifier"
|
||||
server_args.decoupled_spec_bind_endpoint = "ipc:///tmp/v"
|
||||
server_args.decoupled_spec_connect_endpoints = ["ipc:///tmp/d"]
|
||||
server_args.decoupled_spec_rank = 0
|
||||
|
||||
port_args = PortArgs.init_new(server_args)
|
||||
|
||||
self.assertIsNotNone(port_args.decoupled_spec_ipc_config)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(port_args.decoupled_spec_ipc_config.rank, 0)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
port_args.decoupled_spec_ipc_config.bind_endpoint, "ipc:///tmp/v"
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
port_args.decoupled_spec_ipc_config.connect_endpoints, ("ipc:///tmp/d",)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@patch("sglang.srt.server_args.tempfile.NamedTemporaryFile")
|
||||
def test_init_new_no_decoupled_config_when_role_null(self, mock_temp_file):
|
||||
mock_temp_file.return_value.name = "temp_file"
|
||||
|
||||
server_args = ServerArgs(model_path="dummy")
|
||||
server_args.nccl_port = None
|
||||
server_args.enable_dp_attention = False
|
||||
# decoupled_spec_role defaults to "null"
|
||||
|
||||
port_args = PortArgs.init_new(server_args)
|
||||
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(port_args.decoupled_spec_ipc_config)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_init_new_decoupled_role_requires_endpoints(self):
|
||||
server_args = ServerArgs(model_path="dummy")
|
||||
server_args.nccl_port = None
|
||||
server_args.enable_dp_attention = False
|
||||
server_args.decoupled_spec_role = "drafter"
|
||||
# endpoints intentionally left as their None defaults
|
||||
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(ValueError):
|
||||
PortArgs.init_new(server_args)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_init_new_with_single_node_dp_attention(self):
|
||||
|
||||
server_args = ServerArgs(model_path="dummy")
|
||||
@@ -919,6 +965,54 @@ class TestNgramExternalSamArgs(CustomTestCase):
|
||||
self.assertIn("external-corpus-max-tokens", str(context.exception))
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestDecoupledSpecArgs(CustomTestCase):
|
||||
"""Decoupled speculative-decoding CLI flags.
|
||||
|
||||
These flags are auto-derived from the ``A[...]`` field metadata on
|
||||
``ServerArgs``; a bare annotation is silently skipped by
|
||||
``add_cli_args_from_dataclass``. This guards against the regression where
|
||||
the flags went missing (e.g. after rebasing onto the auto-gen
|
||||
``add_cli_args``), which the direct-attribute ``PortArgs`` tests cannot
|
||||
catch because they never exercise the CLI.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
def test_decoupled_spec_cli_flags_round_trip(self):
|
||||
server_args = prepare_server_args(
|
||||
[
|
||||
"--model-path",
|
||||
"dummy",
|
||||
"--decoupled-spec-role",
|
||||
"verifier",
|
||||
"--decoupled-spec-bind-endpoint",
|
||||
"ipc:///tmp/v",
|
||||
"--decoupled-spec-connect-endpoints",
|
||||
'["ipc:///tmp/d"]',
|
||||
"--decoupled-spec-rank",
|
||||
"0",
|
||||
"--spec-trace-dir",
|
||||
"/tmp/tr",
|
||||
]
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(server_args.decoupled_spec_role, "verifier")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(server_args.decoupled_spec_bind_endpoint, "ipc:///tmp/v")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(server_args.decoupled_spec_connect_endpoints, ["ipc:///tmp/d"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(server_args.decoupled_spec_rank, 0)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(server_args.spec_trace_dir, "/tmp/tr")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_decoupled_spec_role_defaults_to_null(self):
|
||||
server_args = prepare_server_args(["--model-path", "dummy"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(server_args.decoupled_spec_role, "null")
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(server_args.decoupled_spec_bind_endpoint)
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(server_args.decoupled_spec_connect_endpoints)
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(server_args.decoupled_spec_rank)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_decoupled_spec_role_rejects_invalid_choice(self):
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(SystemExit):
|
||||
prepare_server_args(
|
||||
["--model-path", "dummy", "--decoupled-spec-role", "bogus"]
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestAdaptiveSpecArgs(CustomTestCase):
|
||||
def test_adaptive_defaults_to_config_step_when_spec_params_omitted(self):
|
||||
with tempfile.NamedTemporaryFile("w", suffix=".json") as f:
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,272 @@
|
||||
"""Unit tests for srt/speculative/decoupled_spec_io.
|
||||
|
||||
decoupled_spec_io is the schema-only IPC layer for decoupled speculative
|
||||
decoding: protocol message dataclasses, the cross-process request id codec, and
|
||||
the drafter-side reconciliation helpers. These tests drive the real logic (id
|
||||
round-trip + parse errors, commit validation, segment coalescing / contiguity /
|
||||
prefix extraction, and inbox routing) on CPU; there is no GPU or transport here.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
import unittest
|
||||
|
||||
from sglang.srt.speculative.decoupled_spec_io import (
|
||||
DraftClose,
|
||||
DraftControlBatch,
|
||||
DraftMeshMessage,
|
||||
DraftMeshMessageType,
|
||||
DraftReqKey,
|
||||
DraftSync,
|
||||
VerifierCommitSegment,
|
||||
VerifyCommit,
|
||||
build_draft_scheduler_rid,
|
||||
parse_draft_scheduler_rid,
|
||||
)
|
||||
from sglang.test.ci.ci_register import register_cpu_ci
|
||||
from sglang.test.test_utils import CustomTestCase
|
||||
|
||||
register_cpu_ci(est_time=6, suite="base-a-test-cpu")
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _commit(rid, *, pre, tokens, src_verifier_rank=0, drafter_rank=0) -> VerifyCommit:
|
||||
return VerifyCommit(
|
||||
request_id=rid,
|
||||
src_verifier_rank=src_verifier_rank,
|
||||
dst_drafter_rank=drafter_rank,
|
||||
pre_verify_committed_len=pre,
|
||||
committed_tokens=list(tokens),
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _segment(
|
||||
rid, *, pre=0, drafter_rank=0, src_verifier_rank=0
|
||||
) -> VerifierCommitSegment:
|
||||
return VerifierCommitSegment(
|
||||
draft_key=DraftReqKey(src_verifier_rank=src_verifier_rank, request_id=rid),
|
||||
dst_drafter_rank=drafter_rank,
|
||||
pre_verify_committed_len=pre,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestDraftSchedulerRid(CustomTestCase):
|
||||
def test_round_trip(self):
|
||||
key = DraftReqKey(src_verifier_rank=3, request_id="req-1")
|
||||
rid = build_draft_scheduler_rid(key)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(rid, "draft:3:req-1")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(parse_draft_scheduler_rid(rid), key)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_request_id_containing_colon_round_trips(self):
|
||||
# request_id may contain ':' — parse splits on the first ':' only.
|
||||
key = DraftReqKey(src_verifier_rank=1, request_id="a:b:c")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(parse_draft_scheduler_rid(build_draft_scheduler_rid(key)), key)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_parse_invalid_rid_raises(self):
|
||||
for bad in ["no-prefix", "draft:", "draft:0:", "draft:notint:r"]:
|
||||
with self.subTest(rid=bad):
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(ValueError):
|
||||
parse_draft_scheduler_rid(bad)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestVerifyCommitValidation(CustomTestCase):
|
||||
def test_empty_tokens_raises(self):
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(ValueError):
|
||||
_commit("r", pre=0, tokens=[]).validate_committed_tokens()
|
||||
|
||||
def test_negative_pre_len_raises(self):
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(ValueError):
|
||||
_commit("r", pre=-1, tokens=[1]).validate_committed_tokens()
|
||||
|
||||
def test_valid_commit_passes(self):
|
||||
# Should not raise.
|
||||
_commit("r", pre=0, tokens=[1, 2]).validate_committed_tokens()
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestVerifierCommitSegment(CustomTestCase):
|
||||
def test_append_coalesces_contiguous_commits(self):
|
||||
seg = _segment("r", pre=0)
|
||||
seg.append_message(_commit("r", pre=0, tokens=[10, 11]))
|
||||
self.assertEqual(seg.committed_tokens, [10, 11])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(seg.end_committed_len, 2)
|
||||
seg.append_message(_commit("r", pre=2, tokens=[12]))
|
||||
self.assertEqual(seg.committed_tokens, [10, 11, 12])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(seg.end_committed_len, 3)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_append_wrong_request_raises(self):
|
||||
seg = _segment("r", pre=0)
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(RuntimeError):
|
||||
seg.append_message(_commit("other", pre=0, tokens=[1]))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_append_wrong_drafter_rank_raises(self):
|
||||
seg = _segment("r", pre=0, drafter_rank=0)
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(RuntimeError):
|
||||
seg.append_message(_commit("r", pre=0, tokens=[1], drafter_rank=7))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_append_non_contiguous_raises(self):
|
||||
seg = _segment("r", pre=0)
|
||||
seg.append_message(_commit("r", pre=0, tokens=[10])) # end -> 1
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(RuntimeError):
|
||||
seg.append_message(_commit("r", pre=5, tokens=[11])) # gap
|
||||
|
||||
def test_append_runs_message_validation(self):
|
||||
seg = _segment("r", pre=0)
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(ValueError):
|
||||
seg.append_message(_commit("r", pre=0, tokens=[])) # empty -> validate
|
||||
|
||||
def test_extract_prefix_splits_segment(self):
|
||||
seg = _segment("r", pre=0)
|
||||
seg.append_message(_commit("r", pre=0, tokens=[10, 11, 12, 13]))
|
||||
prefix = seg.extract_prefix(2)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(prefix.committed_tokens, [10, 11])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(prefix.pre_verify_committed_len, 0)
|
||||
# Remainder stays in the original segment, with pre advanced by 2.
|
||||
self.assertEqual(seg.committed_tokens, [12, 13])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(seg.pre_verify_committed_len, 2)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(seg.end_committed_len, 4)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_extract_prefix_bounds(self):
|
||||
seg = _segment("r", pre=0)
|
||||
seg.append_message(_commit("r", pre=0, tokens=[10, 11]))
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(ValueError):
|
||||
seg.extract_prefix(0)
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(ValueError):
|
||||
seg.extract_prefix(3) # exceeds segment length
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestDraftControlInbox(CustomTestCase):
|
||||
def _inbox(self):
|
||||
from sglang.srt.speculative.decoupled_spec_io import DraftControlInbox
|
||||
|
||||
return DraftControlInbox()
|
||||
|
||||
def _sync(self, rid, drafter_rank=0):
|
||||
return DraftSync(
|
||||
request_id=rid, src_verifier_rank=0, dst_drafter_rank=drafter_rank
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def _close(self, rid, drafter_rank=0):
|
||||
return DraftClose(
|
||||
request_id=rid,
|
||||
src_verifier_rank=0,
|
||||
dst_drafter_rank=drafter_rank,
|
||||
reason="x",
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_add_control_batch_routes_each_message_type(self):
|
||||
inbox = self._inbox()
|
||||
inbox.add_control_batch_locked(
|
||||
DraftControlBatch(
|
||||
dst_drafter_rank=0,
|
||||
sync_messages=[self._sync("s")],
|
||||
verify_commit_messages=[_commit("c", pre=0, tokens=[1])],
|
||||
close_messages=[self._close("x")],
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual([m.request_id for m in inbox.sync_messages], ["s"])
|
||||
self.assertIn(DraftReqKey(0, "c"), inbox.verifier_commit_segments)
|
||||
self.assertIn(DraftReqKey(0, "x"), inbox.close_keys)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_close_drops_pending_segment_and_sync(self):
|
||||
inbox = self._inbox()
|
||||
inbox.add_control_batch_locked(
|
||||
DraftControlBatch(
|
||||
dst_drafter_rank=0,
|
||||
sync_messages=[self._sync("r")],
|
||||
verify_commit_messages=[_commit("r", pre=0, tokens=[1])],
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
inbox.add_close_key_locked(DraftReqKey(0, "r"))
|
||||
self.assertEqual(inbox.sync_messages, [])
|
||||
self.assertNotIn(DraftReqKey(0, "r"), inbox.verifier_commit_segments)
|
||||
self.assertIn(DraftReqKey(0, "r"), inbox.close_keys)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_verify_commit_for_closed_key_is_ignored(self):
|
||||
inbox = self._inbox()
|
||||
inbox.add_close_key_locked(DraftReqKey(0, "r"))
|
||||
inbox.add_verify_commit_locked(_commit("r", pre=0, tokens=[1]))
|
||||
self.assertNotIn(DraftReqKey(0, "r"), inbox.verifier_commit_segments)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_extract_ready_controls_full_consume(self):
|
||||
inbox = self._inbox()
|
||||
inbox.add_control_batch_locked(
|
||||
DraftControlBatch(
|
||||
dst_drafter_rank=0,
|
||||
sync_messages=[self._sync("s")],
|
||||
verify_commit_messages=[_commit("c", pre=0, tokens=[1, 2])],
|
||||
close_messages=[self._close("x")],
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
ready = inbox.extract_ready_controls_locked(
|
||||
lambda seg: len(seg.committed_tokens)
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual([m.request_id for m in ready.sync_messages], ["s"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual({k.request_id for k in ready.close_keys}, {"x"})
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(ready.ready_commit_segments), 1)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(ready.ready_commit_segments[0].committed_tokens, [1, 2])
|
||||
# Fully consumed -> the segment is gone; inbox drained.
|
||||
self.assertTrue(inbox.is_empty())
|
||||
|
||||
def test_extract_ready_controls_zero_consumable_keeps_segment(self):
|
||||
inbox = self._inbox()
|
||||
inbox.add_verify_commit_locked(_commit("c", pre=0, tokens=[1, 2]))
|
||||
ready = inbox.extract_ready_controls_locked(lambda seg: 0)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(ready.ready_commit_segments, [])
|
||||
# Segment is left buffered for a later step.
|
||||
self.assertIn(DraftReqKey(0, "c"), inbox.verifier_commit_segments)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_extract_ready_controls_partial_consume_buffers_remainder(self):
|
||||
inbox = self._inbox()
|
||||
inbox.add_verify_commit_locked(_commit("c", pre=0, tokens=[1, 2, 3]))
|
||||
ready = inbox.extract_ready_controls_locked(lambda seg: 1)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(ready.ready_commit_segments[0].committed_tokens, [1])
|
||||
# Remainder [2, 3] stays buffered with pre advanced to 1.
|
||||
seg = inbox.verifier_commit_segments[DraftReqKey(0, "c")]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(seg.committed_tokens, [2, 3])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(seg.pre_verify_committed_len, 1)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_close_in_same_batch_drops_sync_and_commit(self):
|
||||
# add_control_batch applies close first, so a same-key sync/commit in the
|
||||
# same batch is dropped/ignored: close wins within one batch.
|
||||
inbox = self._inbox()
|
||||
inbox.add_control_batch_locked(
|
||||
DraftControlBatch(
|
||||
dst_drafter_rank=0,
|
||||
sync_messages=[self._sync("r")],
|
||||
verify_commit_messages=[_commit("r", pre=0, tokens=[1])],
|
||||
close_messages=[self._close("r")],
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(inbox.sync_messages, [])
|
||||
self.assertNotIn(DraftReqKey(0, "r"), inbox.verifier_commit_segments)
|
||||
self.assertEqual({k.request_id for k in inbox.close_keys}, {"r"})
|
||||
|
||||
def test_two_commits_same_key_coalesce_in_inbox(self):
|
||||
# A second commit for an existing key appends to the buffered segment.
|
||||
inbox = self._inbox()
|
||||
inbox.add_verify_commit_locked(_commit("r", pre=0, tokens=[1, 2]))
|
||||
inbox.add_verify_commit_locked(_commit("r", pre=2, tokens=[3]))
|
||||
seg = inbox.verifier_commit_segments[DraftReqKey(0, "r")]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(seg.committed_tokens, [1, 2, 3])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(seg.end_committed_len, 3)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestDraftMeshMessageEnvelope(CustomTestCase):
|
||||
def test_from_control_batch_sets_discriminant_and_slot(self):
|
||||
batch = DraftControlBatch(dst_drafter_rank=0)
|
||||
msg = DraftMeshMessage.from_control_batch(batch)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(msg.message_type, DraftMeshMessageType.CONTROL_BATCH)
|
||||
self.assertIs(msg.control_batch, batch)
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(msg.tail_stream_output_batch)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_from_tail_stream_output_batch_sets_discriminant_and_slot(self):
|
||||
from sglang.srt.speculative.decoupled_spec_io import DraftTailStreamOutputBatch
|
||||
|
||||
batch = DraftTailStreamOutputBatch()
|
||||
msg = DraftMeshMessage.from_tail_stream_output_batch(batch)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
msg.message_type, DraftMeshMessageType.TAIL_STREAM_OUTPUT_BATCH
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertIs(msg.tail_stream_output_batch, batch)
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(msg.control_batch)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
||||
unittest.main(verbosity=3)
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user