[Scheduler] Add HRRN schedule policy to significantly reduce TTFT (#32911)
Co-authored-by: Xiaoyu Zhang <1182563586@qq.com>
This commit is contained in:
co-authored by
Xiaoyu Zhang
parent
5097f9ac95
commit
4df5df911b
@@ -407,6 +407,7 @@ def test_pdmux_split_prefill_schedules_auxiliary_output_copy():
|
||||
scheduler.scheduler_stage_metrics = None
|
||||
scheduler.metrics_reporter = Mock()
|
||||
scheduler.forward_ct = 0
|
||||
scheduler.processed_tokens_counter = 0
|
||||
scheduler._sched_idled = False
|
||||
scheduler.scripted_scheduler_hook = None
|
||||
scheduler.profiler_manager = SimpleNamespace(_profile_batch_predicate=Mock())
|
||||
@@ -431,6 +432,7 @@ def test_pdmux_split_prefill_schedules_auxiliary_output_copy():
|
||||
reqs=[],
|
||||
req_pool_indices=torch.tensor([3]),
|
||||
input_ids=torch.tensor([5]),
|
||||
extend_num_tokens=1,
|
||||
return_logprob=False,
|
||||
return_hidden_states=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,128 @@
|
||||
import unittest
|
||||
from array import array
|
||||
|
||||
from sglang.srt.managers.schedule_batch import Req
|
||||
from sglang.srt.managers.schedule_policy import SchedulePolicy
|
||||
from sglang.srt.mem_cache.radix_cache import RadixCache
|
||||
from sglang.srt.sampling.sampling_params import SamplingParams
|
||||
from sglang.test.ci.ci_register import register_cpu_ci
|
||||
from sglang.test.test_utils import CustomTestCase
|
||||
|
||||
register_cpu_ci(est_time=5, suite="base-a-test-cpu")
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _make_req(rid, origin_input_text, origin_input_ids, sampling_params=None, **kwargs):
|
||||
if sampling_params is None:
|
||||
sampling_params = SamplingParams()
|
||||
return Req(
|
||||
rid,
|
||||
origin_input_text,
|
||||
array("q", origin_input_ids),
|
||||
sampling_params,
|
||||
**kwargs,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestSchedulePolicyHRRN(CustomTestCase):
|
||||
def test_calc_priority_hrrn(self):
|
||||
"""HRRN sorts by response ratio (waited_tokens / uncached_tokens).
|
||||
|
||||
With three fresh reqs (waited_tokens = 0 for all), the ratio is 0 / uncached for each,
|
||||
and stable sort keeps original order among equal keys -- effectively pure SUF via the
|
||||
rid tie-breaker is avoided, so we set a non-zero arrival snapshot on some reqs to exercise
|
||||
the aging half of the formula.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
tree_cache = RadixCache.create_simulated()
|
||||
|
||||
# r_short: small uncached, just arrived (waited=0)
|
||||
# r_long: large uncached, just arrived (waited=0)
|
||||
# r_aged: medium uncached, arrived long ago (waited>>0)
|
||||
r_short = _make_req("short", "a", [1])
|
||||
r_long = _make_req("long", "a" * 10, list(range(10)))
|
||||
r_aged = _make_req("aged", "a" * 3, [1, 2, 3])
|
||||
|
||||
# Fresh reqs arrived with the counter still at 0.
|
||||
r_short.arrival_processed_tokens = 0
|
||||
r_long.arrival_processed_tokens = 0
|
||||
r_aged.arrival_processed_tokens = 0
|
||||
|
||||
waiting_queue = [r_long, r_aged, r_short]
|
||||
|
||||
policy = SchedulePolicy(
|
||||
policy="hrrn",
|
||||
tree_cache=tree_cache,
|
||||
enable_hierarchical_cache=True,
|
||||
enable_priority_scheduling=False,
|
||||
schedule_low_priority_values_first=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
# processed_tokens=1000 -> waited_tokens is 1000 for every req here.
|
||||
# Ratios: short = 1000/1 = 1000; aged = 1000/3 ~= 333; long = 1000/10 = 100.
|
||||
# Highest ratio first -> short, aged, long.
|
||||
policy.calc_priority(waiting_queue, processed_tokens=1000)
|
||||
|
||||
self.assertEqual(waiting_queue[0].rid, "short")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(waiting_queue[1].rid, "aged")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(waiting_queue[2].rid, "long")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_calc_priority_hrrn_aging_overtakes_short(self):
|
||||
"""A long request that has waited enough should overtake a
|
||||
just-arrived short request."""
|
||||
tree_cache = RadixCache.create_simulated()
|
||||
|
||||
r_long_old = _make_req("long_old", "a" * 100, list(range(100)))
|
||||
r_short_new = _make_req("short_new", "a", [1])
|
||||
|
||||
# long_old arrived at counter=0 and has been waiting; short_new
|
||||
# just arrived (its snapshot equals the current counter).
|
||||
r_long_old.arrival_processed_tokens = 0
|
||||
r_short_new.arrival_processed_tokens = 100000
|
||||
|
||||
waiting_queue = [r_short_new, r_long_old]
|
||||
|
||||
policy = SchedulePolicy(
|
||||
policy="hrrn",
|
||||
tree_cache=tree_cache,
|
||||
enable_hierarchical_cache=True,
|
||||
enable_priority_scheduling=False,
|
||||
schedule_low_priority_values_first=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
# processed_tokens=100000 -> long_old.waited = 100000, ratio = 100000/100 = 1000.
|
||||
# short_new.waited = 0, ratio = 0.
|
||||
# long_old should now be first.
|
||||
policy.calc_priority(waiting_queue, processed_tokens=100000)
|
||||
|
||||
self.assertEqual(waiting_queue[0].rid, "long_old")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(waiting_queue[1].rid, "short_new")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_calc_priority_hrrn_cached_length_affects_order(self):
|
||||
"""Cached prefix length shortens uncached, so reqs with the same input
|
||||
length can sort differently by HRRN. Also verifies rid tie-break for
|
||||
equal-ratio reqs.
|
||||
|
||||
Uses _sort_by_hrrn directly to bypass the prefix-match pass inside
|
||||
calc_priority, which would overwrite num_matched_prefix_tokens.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
r_more_cached = _make_req("a", "x" * 100, list(range(100)))
|
||||
r_less_cached = _make_req("b", "x" * 100, list(range(100)))
|
||||
r_tie = _make_req("c", "x" * 100, list(range(100)))
|
||||
|
||||
# r_more_cached: 90 cached -> uncached = 10 -> ratio = 1000 / 10 = 100.
|
||||
# r_less_cached: 0 cached -> uncached = 100 -> ratio = 1000 / 100 = 10.
|
||||
# r_tie: 0 cached -> uncached = 100 -> ratio = 1000 / 100 = 10 (ties with r_less_cached; rid "b" < "c").
|
||||
r_more_cached.num_matched_prefix_tokens = 90
|
||||
r_less_cached.num_matched_prefix_tokens = 0
|
||||
r_tie.num_matched_prefix_tokens = 0
|
||||
r_more_cached.arrival_processed_tokens = 0
|
||||
r_less_cached.arrival_processed_tokens = 0
|
||||
r_tie.arrival_processed_tokens = 0
|
||||
|
||||
waiting_queue = [r_tie, r_less_cached, r_more_cached]
|
||||
SchedulePolicy._sort_by_hrrn(waiting_queue, set(), processed_tokens=1000)
|
||||
|
||||
self.assertEqual(waiting_queue[0].rid, "a")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(waiting_queue[1].rid, "b")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(waiting_queue[2].rid, "c")
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
||||
unittest.main()
|
||||
@@ -45,7 +45,16 @@ class TestServerArgsMigratedCliMetadata(CustomTestCase):
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
self.actions_by_option["--schedule-policy"].choices,
|
||||
["lpm", "random", "fcfs", "dfs-weight", "lof", "priority", "routing-key"],
|
||||
[
|
||||
"lpm",
|
||||
"random",
|
||||
"fcfs",
|
||||
"dfs-weight",
|
||||
"lof",
|
||||
"priority",
|
||||
"routing-key",
|
||||
"hrrn",
|
||||
],
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
self.actions_by_option["--load-balance-method"].choices,
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user