Refactor: observability code cleanup (#17862)
Signed-off-by: Feng Su <sufeng@linux.alibaba.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -17,23 +17,23 @@ This section explains how to configure the request tracing and export the trace
|
||||
pip install opentelemetry-sdk opentelemetry-api opentelemetry-exporter-otlp opentelemetry-exporter-otlp-proto-grpc
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
2. launch opentelemetry collector and jaeger
|
||||
2. Launch OpenTelemetry collector and Jaeger
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
docker compose -f examples/monitoring/tracing_compose.yaml up -d
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
3. start your SGLang server with tracing enabled
|
||||
3. Start your SGLang server with tracing enabled
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# set env variables
|
||||
export SGLANG_OTLP_EXPORTER_SCHEDULE_DELAY_MILLIS=500
|
||||
export SGLANG_OTLP_EXPORTER_MAX_EXPORT_BATCH_SIZE=64
|
||||
# start the prefill and decode server
|
||||
python -m sglang.launch_server --enable-trace --otlp-traces-endpoint 0.0.0.0:4317 <other option>
|
||||
# start the mini lb
|
||||
# start the model-gate-way
|
||||
python -m sglang_router.launch_router --enable-trace --otlp-traces-endpoint 0.0.0.0:4317 <other option>
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Replace `0.0.0.0:4317` with the actual endpoint of the opentelemetry collector. If you launched the openTelemetry collector with tracing_compose.yaml, the default receiving port is 4317.
|
||||
Replace `0.0.0.0:4317` with the actual endpoint of the OpenTelemetry collector. If you launched the openTelemetry collector with tracing_compose.yaml, the default receiving port is 4317.
|
||||
|
||||
To use the HTTP/protobuf span exporter, set the following environment variable and point to an HTTP endpoint, for example, `http://0.0.0.0:4318/v1/traces`.
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
@@ -41,15 +41,33 @@ This section explains how to configure the request tracing and export the trace
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
4. raise some requests
|
||||
4. Raise some requests
|
||||
5. Observe whether trace data is being exported
|
||||
* Access port 16686 of Jaeger using a web browser to visualize the request traces.
|
||||
* The OpenTelemetry Collector also exports trace data in JSON format to /tmp/otel_trace.json. In a follow-up patch, we will provide a tool to convert this data into a Perfetto-compatible format, enabling visualization of requests in the Perfetto UI.
|
||||
|
||||
## How to add Tracing for slices you're interested in?
|
||||
6. Dynamically adjust trace level
|
||||
The trace level accepts configurable values from `0` to `3`. The meanings of different trace level values are as follows:
|
||||
```
|
||||
0: disable tracing
|
||||
1: Trace important slices
|
||||
2: Trace all slices except nested ones
|
||||
3: Trace all slices
|
||||
```
|
||||
The trace level can be dynamically set via HTTP API, for example:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
curl http://0.0.0.0:30000/set_trace_level?level=2
|
||||
```
|
||||
Replace `0.0.0.0:30000` with your actual server address, and replace `level=2` with the level you want to set.
|
||||
|
||||
**Note**: You must set the parameter `--enable-trace`; otherwise, the trace capability will not be enabled regardless of any dynamic adjustments to the trace level.
|
||||
|
||||
## How to add Tracing for slices you're interested in?(API introduction)
|
||||
We have already inserted instrumentation points in the tokenizer and scheduler main threads. If you wish to trace additional request execution segments or perform finer-grained tracing, please use the APIs from the tracing package as described below.
|
||||
|
||||
1. initialization
|
||||
**All of the following implementations are done in python/sglang/srt/observability/req_time_stats.py. If you want to add another slice, please do it here.**
|
||||
|
||||
1. Initialization
|
||||
|
||||
Every process involved in tracing during the initialization phase should execute:
|
||||
```python
|
||||
@@ -63,98 +81,53 @@ We have already inserted instrumentation points in the tokenizer and scheduler m
|
||||
```
|
||||
The "thread label" can be regarded as the name of the thread, used to distinguish different threads in the visualization view.
|
||||
|
||||
2. Mark the beginning and end of a request
|
||||
```
|
||||
trace_req_start(rid, bootstrap_room)
|
||||
trace_req_finish(rid)
|
||||
```
|
||||
These two APIs must be called within the same process, for example, in the tokenizer.
|
||||
2. Create a trace context for a request
|
||||
Each request needs to call `TraceReqContext()` to initialize a request context, which is used to generate slice spans and record request stage info. You can either store it within the request object or maintain it as a global variable.
|
||||
|
||||
3. Add tracing for slice
|
||||
3. Mark the beginning and end of a request
|
||||
```
|
||||
trace_ctx.trace_req_start().
|
||||
trace_ctx.trace_req_finish()
|
||||
```
|
||||
trace_req_start() and trace_req_finish() must be called within the same process, for example, in the tokenizer.
|
||||
|
||||
4. Add tracing for a slice
|
||||
|
||||
* Add slice tracing normally:
|
||||
```python
|
||||
trace_slice_start("slice A", rid)
|
||||
trace_slice_end("slice A", rid)
|
||||
trace_ctx.trace_slice_start(RequestStage.TOKENIZER.stage_name)
|
||||
trace_ctx.trace_slice_end(RequestStage.TOKENIZER.stage_name)
|
||||
|
||||
or
|
||||
trace_ctx.trace_slice(slice: TraceSliceContext)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
- Use the "anonymous" flag to not specify a slice name at the start of the slice, allowing the slice name to be determined by trace_slice_end.
|
||||
<br>Note: Anonymous slices must not be nested.
|
||||
- The end of the last slice in a thread must be marked with thread_finish_flag=True, or explicitly call trace_ctx.abort(); otherwise, the thread's span will not be properly generated.
|
||||
```python
|
||||
trace_slice_start("", rid, anonymous = True)
|
||||
trace_slice_end("slice A", rid)
|
||||
trace_ctx.slice_end(RequestStage.D.stage_name, thread_finish_flag = True)
|
||||
trace_ctx.abort()
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
- In trace_slice_end, use auto_next_anon to automatically create the next anonymous slice, which can reduce the number of instrumentation points needed.
|
||||
```python
|
||||
trace_slice_start("", rid, anonymous = True)
|
||||
trace_slice_end("slice A", rid, auto_next_anon = True)
|
||||
trace_slice_end("slice B", rid, auto_next_anon = True)
|
||||
trace_slice_end("slice C", rid, auto_next_anon = True)
|
||||
trace_slice_end("slice D", rid)
|
||||
```
|
||||
- The end of the last slice in a thread must be marked with thread_finish_flag=True; otherwise, the thread's span will not be properly generated.
|
||||
```python
|
||||
trace_slice_end("slice D", rid, thread_finish_flag = True)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
4. When the request execution flow transfers to another thread, the trace context needs to be explicitly propagated.
|
||||
- sender: Execute the following code before sending the request to another thread via ZMQ
|
||||
```python
|
||||
trace_context = trace_get_proc_propagate_context(rid)
|
||||
req.trace_context = trace_context
|
||||
```
|
||||
5. When the request execution flow transfers to another thread, the thread context needs to be explicitly rebuilt.
|
||||
- receiver: Execute the following code after receiving the request via ZMQ
|
||||
```python
|
||||
trace_set_proc_propagate_context(rid, req.trace_context)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
5. When the request execution flow transfers to another node(PD disaggregation), the trace context needs to be explicitly propagated.
|
||||
- sender: Execute the following code before sending the request to node thread via http
|
||||
```python
|
||||
trace_context = trace_get_remote_propagate_context(bootstrap_room_list)
|
||||
headers = {"trace_context": trace_context}
|
||||
session.post(url, headers=headers)
|
||||
```
|
||||
- receiver: Execute the following code after receiving the request via http
|
||||
```python
|
||||
trace_set_remote_propagate_context(request.headers['trace_context'])
|
||||
trace_ctx.rebuild_thread_context()
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## How to Extend the Tracing Framework to Support Complex Tracing Scenarios
|
||||
|
||||
The currently provided tracing package still has potential for further development. If you wish to build more advanced features upon it, you must first understand its existing design principles.
|
||||
|
||||
The core of the tracing framework's implementation lies in the design of the span structure and the trace context. To aggregate scattered slices and enable concurrent tracking of multiple requests, we have designed a two-level trace context structure and a four-level span structure: `SglangTraceReqContext`, `SglangTraceThreadContext`. Their relationship is as follows:
|
||||
The core of the tracing framework's implementation lies in the design of the span structure and the trace context. To aggregate scattered slices and enable concurrent tracking of multiple requests, we have designed a three-level trace context structure or span structure: `TraceReqContext`, `TraceThreadContext` and `TraceSliceContext`. Their relationship is as follows:
|
||||
```
|
||||
SglangTraceReqContext (req_id="req-123")
|
||||
├── SglangTraceThreadContext(thread_label="scheduler", tp_rank=0)
|
||||
TraceReqContext (req_id="req-123")
|
||||
├── TraceThreadContext(thread_label="scheduler", tp_rank=0)
|
||||
| └── TraceSliceContext(slice_name="prefill")
|
||||
|
|
||||
└── SglangTraceThreadContext(thread_label="scheduler", tp_rank=1)
|
||||
└── TraceThreadContext(thread_label="scheduler", tp_rank=1)
|
||||
└── TraceSliceContext(slice_name="prefill")
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Each traced request maintains a global `SglangTraceReqContext`. For every thread processing the request, a corresponding `SglangTraceThreadContext` is recorded and composed within the `SglangTraceReqContext`. Within each thread, every currently traced slice (possibly nested) is stored in a list.
|
||||
Each traced request maintains a global `TraceReqContext` and creates a corresponding request span. For every thread that processes the request, a `TraceThreadContext` is recorded and a thread span is created. The `TraceThreadContext` is nested within the `TraceReqContext`, and each currently traced code slice—potentially nested—is stored in its associated `TraceThreadContext`.
|
||||
|
||||
In addition to the above hierarchy, each slice also records its previous slice via Span.add_link(), which can be used to trace the execution flow.
|
||||
|
||||
When the request execution flow transfers to a new thread, the trace context needs to be explicitly propagated. In the framework, this is represented by `SglangTracePropagateContext`, which contains the context of the request span and the previous slice span.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
We designed a four-level span structure, consisting of `bootstrap_room_span`, `req_root_span`, `thread_span`, and `slice_span`. Among them, `req_root_span` and `thread_span` correspond to `SglangTraceReqContext` and `SglangTraceThreadContext`, respectively, and `slice_span` is stored within the `SglangTraceThreadContext`. The `bootstrap_room_span` is designed to accommodate the separation of PD-disaggregation. On different nodes, we may want to add certain attributes to the `req_root_span`. However, if the `req_root_span` is shared across all nodes, the Prefill and Decode nodes would not be allowed to add attributes due to the constraints imposed by OpenTelemetry's design.
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
bootstrap room span
|
||||
├── router req root span
|
||||
| └── router thread span
|
||||
| └── slice span
|
||||
├── prefill req root span
|
||||
| ├── tokenizer thread span
|
||||
| | └── slice span
|
||||
| └── scheduler thread span
|
||||
| └── slice span
|
||||
└── decode req root span
|
||||
├── tokenizer thread span
|
||||
| └── slice span
|
||||
└── scheduler thread span
|
||||
└── slice span
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user